The phrase ‘big brother is watching you’ may take on a whole new meaning in Ottawa if the Ottawa Police Service decides to attach small video cameras to officers’ uniforms.
The head of the Ottawa Police Association suggested that officers be provided with cameras in the hope that it will prevent lawsuits. The video cameras would help officers to show their side of the story when onlookers shoot videos on their cell phones. In light of recent lawsuits accusing officers of using excessive force, this idea may have some merit.
People who support the use of these cameras also argue that being filmed will encourage both officers and citizens to act more responsibly and respectfully.
These advantages to the cameras are undeniable. However, there are also problems with the idea. First, people must consider the price of the cameras. These little cameras can cost up to $1,800 each. Where is that money going to come from in cash-strapped city?
In Victoria, B.C., the police experimented with the cameras in 2009, but abandoned the project because it was simply too expensive.
Of course, it can be argued that the money spent on the cameras may save some of the money being spent on legal fees. However, the cameras will not prevent all lawsuits. There will still be costly legal proceedings. The cameras may just help as evidence.There are also non-monetary concerns associated with the cameras to consider.
What do these cameras mean for privacy? Of course, when officers are on public duty it is reasonable for them to be filmed. However, what if they are responding to a house call? They do not have the right to invade someone’s privacy by filming on private property.
As well, what if officers catch something on camera that they are not looking for and for which they do not have a proper search warrant? That would open up cases to arguments of unreasonable search and seizure.
The cameras also may have a chilling effect on people willing to approach the police. Many people are uncomfortable being filmed and, in sensitive situations, may not want to be talk to officers for this reason.
So what is the right answer for Ottawa? It would be appropriate to use the cameras in some situations; however, it is unreasonable and unaffordable for all on-duty officers to have the cameras.
The Ottawa Police Service should purchase some cameras, but only give them to officers who are going into situations that they consider potentially risky.
For example, if officers are going to a protest where there is likely to be hostile confrontation, such as Occupy Ottawa, they should be required to wear cameras.
If Ottawa police are provided with cameras, there should at least be a strict policy that it is turned on only when it appears that a situation is becoming confrontational.
That way, police officers can have the videos to protect themselves and regular citizens do not need to worry about being caught on camera every time a police officer walks by.